Jonathan Chuang, on behalf of himself and all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff, v. Dr. Pepper Snapple Group, Inc., Mott’s,
LLP and General Mills, Inc., Defendants, Case No. BC649291, (Cal.
Super., February 6, 2017), seeks compensatory, treble and punitive
damages, prejudgment interest on all amounts awarded, restitution
and all other forms of equitable monetary relief, injunctive
relief, reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses and costs
resulting from breach of express and implied warranty, unjust
enrichment and for violation of the California Consumers Legal
Remedies Act, and California Business and Professions Code.
Dr. Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. is a corporation organized under
the laws of Delaware, with its principal place of business at 5301
Legacy Drive, Plano, Texas, 75024. Dr. Pepper is in the business
of developing, manufacturing, distributing, and selling beverages
and snack products under various brands, including Mott’s and Dr.
Pepper while General Mills produces, markets, distributes and
licenses the Fruit Snacks under the authority of Dr. Pepper and
Defendants are accused of placing pictures of fresh fruits and
vegetables on their product labels, despite the fact that they
are mostly a combination of corn syrup, sugar and modified corn
starch, says the complaint.
The Plaintiffs bought their products under the impression that
they contain significant amounts of fresh fruits and vegetables as
shown on their product labels.
Plaintiff is represented by:
– and –
Stephen Gardner, Esq.
Amanda Howell (Pro Hac Vice forthcoming)
STANLEY LAW GROUP
6116 N. Central Expressway, Suite 1500
Dallas, TX 75206
Tel: (214) 443-4300
Fax: (214) 443-0358