Class Action Money and Ethics Conference 2017

Home » Class Action Reporter » COTY INC: “Caddell” Sues Over Hair Coloring Side Effects

COTY INC: “Caddell” Sues Over Hair Coloring Side Effects

Enter your email address to follow Class Action Reporter and receive notifications of new stories by email.

Join 596 other followers

Mamie Caddell and Diane Bowden, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Coty, Inc., The Procter & Gamble Company, Inc., The Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Company, Inc., The Procter & Gamble Distributing, L.L.C., Procter & Gamble Hair Care, L.L.C., Defendants, Case No. 7:17-cv-00322, (N.D. Ala., February 28, 2017), seeks damages and equitable remedies resulting from unjust enrichment, fraud, breach of express and implied warranty and violation of the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act and Alabama Deceptive Trade Practices Act.

Procter and Gamble developed, designed, formulated, manufactured, packaged, labeled, advertised, marketed, distributed and sold Clairol hair dye products. Clairol Balsam Color brand was sold to Coty, Inc. in July, 2015.

Said product line allegedly causes significant hair loss, skin and scalp irritation, scalp burnings and blistering, severe dermatitis, eye irritation and tearing, asthma, gastritis, renal damage and/or failure, vertigo, tremors, convulsions and comas and eczematoid contact dermatitis.

Plaintiff is represented by:

Brandy L. Robertson, Esq.
W. Lewis Garrison, Jr., Esq.
Brandy Lee Robertson, Esq.
HENINGER GARRISON DAVIS, LLC
2224 First Avenue North
Birmingham, AL 35203